Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Water Treatment
Anonymous

Date:
Water Treatment
Permalink   


On of the most insidious (and overlooked) killers is the way the "system" treats water. Chlorine, which is a potent toxin, is the preferred treatment for water systems. Most likely because it's the cheapest. No asks the question...but what good is cost when the process is killing people? I suspect that chlorine is also used because it is a waste by-product from another industry.

The solution to being poisoned by chlorine is to treat the water with Ozone or Hydrogen Peroxide. Both of these treatments are cheap, and best of all non-toxic.

Another "killer" is the addition of fluoride in our drinking water. We were sold the lie a long time ago that it prevented cavities in teeth. This myth was never really proven to be fact, and is now so firmly entrenched that it never is questioned. It's a fact that this situation was concocted to find a way to get rid of this toxin by the aluminum manufacturers...(clever weren't they!) BTW, a good number of countries in Europe have banned this stupid practice.

Both chlorine and fluoride have taken their toll on the health of untold millions of people. Because no one "drops dead" immediately, most people never question the practice of adding these toxins to our water. I guarantee this practice ages us quicker and reduces the quality of our lives over time...just another piece in the puzzle of planned de-population.



__________________


Forum Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink   


quote:






Originally posted by: Anonymous
"Another "killer" is the addition of fluoride in our drinking water. We were sold the lie a long time ago that it prevented cavities in teeth. This myth was never really proven to be fact, and is now so firmly entrenched that it never is questioned.


I guarantee this practice ages us quicker and reduces the quality of our lives over time...just another piece in the puzzle of planned de-population. "






Another example is automobile emissions. If you read the stats from the national traffic administration, they admit that there is no change in emissions since the advent of catalytic converters, pcv, egr, different fuel requirments, etc. But then out of the other side of their mouth, they state that they MUST continue this practices for health and safety. Again, it all boils down to money and control (which are basically the same thing). The root of all evil indeed.


I agree that these chemicals do have a negative effect on our bodies, even if only in the long term. Asthma and other breathing related problems have been on the rise for decades, even with the "cleaning up" of exhaust pollution from the major industries like oil and steel plants.


Your fluoride comment has made me think of another topic that I will start a topic on. The use of Mercury (commonly called amalgam) fillings in dentistry.



__________________
Shelly

Date:
Permalink   


<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->

The above thought is smart and doesnt require any further addition. Its perfect thought from my side.A very smart and diplomatic answer. Its really appreciable and general. This is a wonderful opinion. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Shelly Smith.

lawyer directory

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard